{"id":125,"date":"2006-05-02T12:33:54","date_gmt":"2006-05-02T12:33:54","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","slug":"Design_of_Grange_Road\/Industrial_Estate_junction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/davidhealy.com\/?p=125","title":{"rendered":"Design of Grange Road\/Industrial Estate junction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At the Area Committee meeting on 25th April,&nbsp; my motion about the design of the new junction on Grange Road came up.&nbsp; Local cyclists have expressed their concern to me about the current design, which removed the hard shoulder going up over the bridge.&nbsp; Additionally, it included a cycle lane coming off the bridge on the inside of a left-turning lane, which is not where a cyclist should be.&nbsp; A new design was shown to us. I have some concerns about it and have put them in writing to as below.&nbsp; I will include a further update when available.<\/p>\n<p>To: Peter Caulfield, Transportation Department, Fingal County Council<br \/>by email<\/p>\n<p>Dear Peter,<\/p>\n<p>Thank you for showing us the proposed redesign of the junction last week.<\/p>\n<p>In relation to the design, I have the following comments.<\/p>\n<p>I welcome the removal of one of the 3 eastbound lanes coming into the junction, to give more room for westbound traffic.<\/p>\n<p>I am concerned at the design including cycle lanes within an existing lane. By the design shown, it is not possible for a car or truck to use this lane without travelling in the cycle lane.&nbsp; This seems to be the case northbound entering the junction on the industrial estate road and eastbound entering the junction on grange road.&nbsp; It seems to me that these could have 3 undesirable effects<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; 1. They are likely to encourage cyclists to stay left at the junction.&nbsp; In fact, safe cycling requires that a cyclist travelling straight on should not stay to the left of the lane as to do so would risk a car or truck turning left across them.&nbsp; Safe cyclists will occupy the centre of the straight ahead lane.<br \/>&nbsp;&nbsp; 2. They may encourage cyclists to travel up on the inside of trucks, which puts cyclists in a particularly dangerous position.<br \/>&nbsp;&nbsp; 3. They may encourage motor vehicles to pass cyclists without moving fully into the adjacent lane.<\/p>\n<p>If there is a good reason for this design I would like to hear of it.<\/p>\n<p>I am also concerned at the width of the cycle lane over the bridge.&nbsp; The previous situation was a good wide hard shoulder.&nbsp; The new situation should not lead to any reduction in safety for cyclists.&nbsp; There is a tendency for a motor vehicle user to assume that it is safe to pass a cyclist on a cycle lane as long as each road user remains in their lane.&nbsp; This, of course, is not the case, but it is a consequence of cycle lane design.&nbsp; Narrow cycle lanes (especially if associated with other narrow lanes and markings such as central hatching) can encourage motor vehicle users to pass closer than they would otherwise have done.&nbsp;&nbsp; In this case, we are talking about a road with high levels of HGVs, making safe passing even more important for cyclists&rsquo; safety and cyclists&rsquo; perceptions of safety. The width of the lane was not marked on the plan.&nbsp; However, there is a tendency for road engineers to incorrectly assume that a width of 1.5m is standard.&nbsp; In this case, a width of at least 2m would be appropriate<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<br \/>Is mise, le meas,<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<br \/>David Healy<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At the Area Committee meeting on 25th April,&nbsp; my motion about the design of the new junction on Grange Road came up.&nbsp; Local cyclists have expressed their concern to me about the current design, which removed the hard shoulder going up over the bridge.&nbsp; Additionally, it included a cycle lane coming off the bridge on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/davidhealy.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/davidhealy.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/davidhealy.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/davidhealy.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/davidhealy.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=125"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/davidhealy.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/davidhealy.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/davidhealy.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/davidhealy.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}