Monthly Archives: February 2007

Coastal walkway/cycleway design expected this autumn

The coastal walkway/cycleway between Baldoyle and Portmarnock which local people have been campaigning for for decades finally seems to be on the way.
 Motion 28 at yesterday’s meeting:
Councillor D. Healy
"That the Manager report on progress in relation to the coastal walk/cycleway between Baldoyle and Portmarnock."

The report indicated that the study on the Moyne Road was expected by early summer and the coastal route by the end of the year or before.

Some small progress on the Baldoyle-Ballymun light rail

At yesterday’s Area Cttee, I raised the issue of progress in the light rail element of the multimodal study which the Council directed in September 2007 be carried out for the North Fringe/South Fringe Area. 
My motion: "That the Manager report on progress in relation to the light rail
elements of the transport study for the North Fringe/South Fringe Area."

The officials reported back that they have been in discussions with Dublin City Council and the Railway Procurement Agency, both of which have been positive and cooperative.  They are meeting soon to decide how to fund the study and how to approach the selection of consultants.  Fingal’s officials will come back with a further report as soon as meeting has been held.

Meanwhile there will be some sort of report to the Area Cttee. meeting on 15th in relation to Roads in the area.  I hope there will not be an attempt to go ahead with road planning in the absence of public transport planning!

Result of meeting with Dublin Bus and Iarnród Éireann

As I mentioned before, Iarnród Éireann and Dublin Bus came into our Area Cttee. today.  We got some interesting information, but there was definitely no breakthrough on any major issue.

Iarnród Éireann

  •    1. Lack of regular, clock-face Dart Services to Bayside/Sutton/Howth
  •    2. Very low Dart frequency in the evenings especially Sunday evenings

No progress on either of these.  The issue is as set out here
The only explanation I can come up with is that IE have decided to save
a few euros by having one fewer driver on the evening shift.  The
result from the point of view of a resident of Bayside, Baldoyle,
Sutton or Howth is that planning to get a Dart from town in the evening
is a much less attractive option than it was 20 years ago, with waits
of 40 minutes on weekdays and 1 hour on a Sunday.

  •    3. Integrated ticketing between Dart and Bus

Nothing. 
Talk about new systems.  No explanation as to why the existing system
which both DB and IE use at the moment is not used to provide
integrated tickets.

  •    4. Blocking of disabled access to Howth Junction Station

Astonishingly IE appeared not to know what I was talking about.  Fortunately, Dublin City Council understands the issue and has put in planning conditions to address it, and Fingal County Council is taking enforcement action as although most of the station is in Fingal’s area, no planning permission has been sought for it.

  •    5. Development potential at Howth Junction Station
  •    6. Underpass at Bayside Station
  •    7. Layout of car parking and access to beach at Howth Station
  •    8. Parking enforcement at bus stop on Howth Station forecourt
  •    9. Online timetable failing to show connections which can be made at Howth Junction.

Dublin Bus

  •    1. 31C service waiting on the road outside Howth Dart Station
    blocking views of the pedestrian traffic lights and of crossing
    pedestrians

Issue not resolved.  This significant traffic hazard remains.

  •    2. Routing of buses on Howth Peninsula – potential to extend
    the 17A to travel along Kilbarrack Road through Sutton Cross, over
    Howth Summit to Howth Dart Station.(with extra buses on the route of
    course) instead of the 31B.

Because only Clontarf Garage (31s) and not Harristown (17A) was represented at the meeting we couldn’t get any update on this.

There are some planned changes to the buses in the area.  All are
awaiting approval from the Department of Transport, many for long
periods of time.  There is no formal input from Councillors.

The 29A will extend along Grange Rd to a new terminus in Abbey Park. 
When this happens, the 32B will no longer go into Abbey Park, but
travel straight through to Portmarnock.

There will be a new route 128 from the area of the new train station
(near Fr. Collins’ Park) to Donaghmede Roundabout, Clare Hall and down
Malahide Rd to Rathmines, 14/15 buses – 10 minutes all day.

 

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Report released on 2nd February

The Summary for Policymakers of the report, “Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis”, the first volume of “Climate Change 2007”, will be released on 2nd February.  The press conference will be broadcast live on the web.

Extracts from the press release:

"The report assesses the current scientific knowledge of the natural and human
drivers of climate change, observed changes in climate, the ability of
science to attribute changes to different causes, and projections for
future climate change.

"The Report includes significantly advanced observations of the climate
system, presents new projections of future global climate change using
results from 19 climate models, all with improved representations of
physics, chemistry, and spatial resolution. The report also covers the
range of anthropogenic greenhouse gases and other factors that drive
climate change. There will also be a Chapter assessing the
paleoclimatic perspective.

"The WGI report does not cover the impacts of climate change or options
for the mitigation of climate change. These aspects will be covered in
subsequent reports by Working Group II (impacts, adaptation and
vulnerability), and Working Group III (mitigation options) to be
finalised respectively in early April and early May this year In
addition a Synthesis Report covering key findings of all three Working
Groups will be released in late 2007."

The press conference will be broadcast here.

New sewage pipe to end discharge of raw sewage at Nose of Howth

Construction work is starting for the new sewer which will take sewage
from Howth and Sutton to Sutton pumping station.  When finished this
will end the discharge of raw sewage from the nose of Howth.

There will be inevitable disruption during construction, but no work will be allowed on Harbour Road during the summer.

Details of the work are available here, including a large pdf map which explains the project.

Some further relevant details are as follows:

  • There will be no work east of Howth Dart Station between 1st May and 31st September.
  • Working hours are 7am to 7pm Monday to Friday.
  • The road will be reinstated every evening and at weekends.

Issues to be raised with Iarnród Éireann and Dublin Bus

Iarnród Éireann and Dublin Bus are coming to our Area Committee today.
I will be raising the following issues.  Unfortunately, unlike most
European countries, control of public transport is completely centralised in Ireland.  Local authorities have no power over public
transport, so our influence is limited.  I have submitted the following issues to be responded to.
Iarnród Éireann

  1. Lack of regular, clock-face Dart Services to Bayside/Sutton/Howth
  2. Very low Dart frequency in the evenings especially Sunday evenings
  3. Integrated ticketing between Dart and Bus
  4. Blocking of disabled access to Howth Junction Station
  5. Development potential at Howth Junction Station
  6. Underpass at Bayside Station
  7. Layout of car parking and access to beach at Howth Station
  8. Parking enforcement at bus stop on Howth Station forecourt
  9. Online timetable failing to show connections which can be made at Howth Junction.

Dublin Bus

  1. 31C service waiting on the road outside Howth Dart Station blocking views of the pedestrian traffic lights and of crossing pedestrians
  2. Routing of buses on Howth Peninsula – potential to extend the 17A to travel along Kilbarrack Road through Sutton Cross, over Howth Summit to Howth Dart Station.(with extra buses on the route of course) instead of the 31B.

 

New Dart Timetable has fewer trains than 23 years ago

  One-hour gaps between Dart trains to Bayside, Sutton and Howth.

In 1984 there were 6 morning peak-hour departures from Howth (at 0800, 0810, 0825, 0836, 0850 and 0900), compared to 3 trains (0759, 0820 and 0845) over the same period today.  Malahide has 2 Darts and 1 railcar in the same hour, so there is a net reduction in the total number of Dart trains leaving.  There may be a justification that there is a signalling capacity constraint during peak times.

There is no such justification for the lack of evening services:

Sunday evening from City Centre to Howth in 1984 – 10 trains: 2034, 2054, 2119, 2134, 2154, 2214, 2234, 2254, 2314, 2334

Sunday evening from City Centre to Howth in 2007 – 5 trains: 2027, 2110, 2210, 2310, 2350

Maybe the 5 missing Darts are going to Malahide? No, there are only 3 departures to Malahide over this time period: 2040, 2140 and 2240.  

This reduction in services was introduced in 2006 and has been repeated in the 2007 timetable despite strong protests from passengers.

The Greens believe public transport must be maintained as a convenient frequent service throughout the day and in the evenings.  This decline in the Dart service must be reversed.  Trains, trams and buses must be integrated into a single efficient and convenient network.  Public transport is a top priority for Greens in Dublin.

Objection to proposed house on Evora Crescent oil tank

I have objected to the proposed redevelopment of the former oil tank site on Evora Crescent, on the grounds that the site is contaminated yet the application contains no information on how it is to be remediated, and that the proposed house is an overdevelopment of the site, out of keeping with the area
                        

                            24th January 2007

Planning Department,
Fingal County Council,
Main St.,
Swords,
Co. Dublin

By hand

Re: F06A/1898
21-Dec-2006        
Applicant: McMullan Brothers Limited 3 Custom House Plaza, I.F.S.C., Dublin 1
Location: Maxol Fuel Depot, Evora Crescent, Howth, Dublin 13
Proposed Development:    The demolition of the existing tank compound, construction of 1 no. two storey dwelling house with driveway entrance and off-street parking and any ancillary works.

A chairde,

I would like to object to the above development on the following grounds.

1.    The drawings submitted with the application are inadequate. It does not adequately show what is on the site already.  Nor does it show the relationship of the proposal to nearby houses in Evora Park, Evora Crescent or Grace O’Malley Road.

2.    The proposed development involves the excavation of a contaminated site.  The site was an oil depot for Evora Park and was the site of an oil spill which also affected neighbouring properties.  This contamination remains on site.  There is no information in the application on the extent of the existing contamination nor on the methods proposed for remediating the site and removing the existing oil tank and concrete pit in order to construct a house on the site.

3.    The proposed development is out of keeping with the area.  All surrounding houses have front and back gardens.  The proposed house would extend from the front to the back boundaries of the site with minimal garden space to the sides. Visually it would not be in keeping with either the Evora Crescent houses or the Grace O’Malley Road houses.

4.    The proposed development would severely damage the residential amenity of the houses in Evora Park to the north of the site.  The site is significantly elevated above the rear gardens of the Evora Park houses.  The proposal involves a two-storey house at the top of this hill, presenting a tall blank windowless wall to the gardens of these house.  There is no set-back in the development site.

5.    The proposed development involves access to its car parking space from Grace O’Malley Road in a location where there appears to be insufficient space for the necessary turning movements.

I enclose the €20 fee.

Is mise, le meas,
 
Cllr. David Healy

Objection to Balgriffin development

I have objected to a planning application in Balgriffin, primarily against the road designs which would place pedestrians and cyclists at risk.

                           
30th January 2007

Planning Department,
Fingal County Council,
Main St.,
Swords,
Co. Dublin

By hand

Re: F06A/1918

A chairde,

I would like to object to the above development on the following grounds.

1. The road design proposed does not provide for safe use by cyclists.  It seeks to place a cycletrack on the footpath and treat cyclists as pedestrians.

Among the consequences of this design approach at junctions are the following:
a)    a cyclist using the cycletrack and going straight on is at risk from vehicles coming from behind, which is a particularly difficult conflict.
b)    there is no way for a cyclist to turn right.

These design flaws are evident in the plans at all junctions, including the following:

a)    How do cyclists travelling north on the new road and seeking to turn east do so?

b)    How do cyclists travelling east to west on Balgriffin Road do so  if they use the cycletrack provided?

c)    How do cyclists travelling east on the new east-west road turn north onto the new north-south road at the roundabout?

d)    How do cyclists travelling east on the new east-west road turn north onto the Malahide Road?

This is of particular importance as under Irish law cyclists have to use a cycle track if one is provided.
 
2. The design proposes the use of roundabouts without controlled crossing points on all arms.  

Due to the geometry of roundabouts and the fact that the pedestrian has no right of way, a pedestrian has to guess the intention of accelerating and decelerating motorists, both on the roundabout and entering it.  This is a particularly difficult task and for more vulnerable and less mobile pedestrians it is impossible.

These designs are entirely inappropriate in what will be a high-density neighbourhood with a stated intention of providing for a high level of pedestrian and public transport use.

 In fact, the map shows what appears to be a 3lane roundabout, a design which would effectively rule out any safe way for a pedestrian to cross the arms of such a roundabout.  

The proposed design would result in a fragmented urban area, with little pedestrian movement across these junctions simply because it would be so dangerous.

3. The proposed design puts the Mayne River through a culvert instead of making a feature of it.

I enclose the €20 fee.

Is mise, le meas,

David Healy