Objection to lack of disabled access at Howth Junction bears fruit

My objection to the blocking of access from the Dart Station to the Fás Training Centre and Baldoyle Industrial Estate has been taken on board by Dublin City Council
When Iarnród Éireann applied for retention of work at Howth Junction Station, I objected on the basis of lack of access for mobility impaired passengers to Fás and the Industrial Estate.

Today Dublin City Council sent me a copy of their decision, the first condition of which is that there must be mobility impaired access on all accesses/egresses and throughout the site!

Health Impacts of the Built Environment

Yesterday I attended the launch of a report by the Institute of Public Health in Ireland on Health Impacts of the Built Environment.  The launch included a presentation by Richard Jackson, Professor of Environmental Health at the University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health.  The main lesson I took from it for application to my work as a councillor is the importance of walkable neighbourhoods for health.  Creating car-dependent communities has a severe impact on public health.  Medical treatment (at great cost, whether public or private) will not undo this impact.  We as councillors have a particular responsibility to ensure that  our communities are walkable.

These considerations unfortunately did not influence the Council’s decision later on in yesterday in relation to access in Baldoyle.
The review is at http://www.publichealth.ie/index.asp?locID=489&docID=649

Richard Jackson’s presentation should be going up on www.publichealth.ie very soon.

Notes from Special Amenity Area Order Management Committee

The Special Amenity Area Order Management Committee met on 5th July. The following are my incomplete notes from the meeting.
Notes from SAAO meeting 5th July 2006

Poor organisation of the meeting
1.    notice to new members?
2.    minute-taker
3.    dates to members of future meetings
4.    confirm agenda with cathaoirleach
5.    notify library of meetings

I will be raising the above matters with the Corporate Services and Planning Departments of the Council.  I will also be seeking to have the minutes of the Committee put on the Council’s website.

The landowner has indicated that he will clear Shielmartin path if Fingal ask him.  The meeting agreed to check with insurance in council and write if they agree.

Insurance
The question of insurance came up again and will be adressed in detail at the next SAAO Management Committee meeting.  It was agreed to ask the insurance official from the Council to attend next SAAO meeting and address following questions:

Questions to be addressed re insurance
1.    What is the legal basis for liability, if any, arising from us putting up signs showing existing rights of way?
2.    What is the legal basis for liability, if any, if the Council maintains rights of way?
3.    What is the legal basis for liability, if any, if the Council ask landowners to maintain rights of way?
4.    What are the issues relating to disclaimers and warnings?
5.    What is the Council’s claims record in relation to rights of way in Howth and rights of way generally?
6.    What would the insurance cover cost from a commercial company?  
7.    Can we allocate some money from parking fees etc. to cover the insurance cost whether internally or externally?

Maintenance of rights of way to be discussed at next meeting, to include
1.    Set up maintenance fund?
2.    Volunteers doing maintenance?

Report in relation to St. Fintan’s Well
National Monuments met with Conservation officer, NM not concerned about well drying up.  Transport and water services met in relation to these issues.  James Walls didn’t find any answer.  Gerry Clabby to talk to hydrologist.

Middle Mountain
ABP purporting to move right of way – i.e. extinguish existing and create new:
a)    Extinguishment is a reserved function of the Council
b)    designated right of way in the SAAO – can only be varied by the Minister.

Designation of rights of way in development plan
Proposal to use Howth as first and pilot area for showing rights of way in the development plan, implementing GB02.  Agreed to recommend to Corporate Policy Group.

Signage
The Biodiversity Officer and a sub-committee will look at signage issues and draw up proposals for a scheme of signage of the rights-of-way.

Enforcement Issues
Right of way beside Sutton Castle
Entrance to Corr Castle – gate should be open

Strand Road car park
Recommended against it

Planning applications
Query – terms of reference of SAAO committee in looking at implementation of SAAO Order in relation to planning applications etc.

Strand Road Car Park proposal turned down

The proposed  car park on Strand Road Sutton has been turned down by the elected Council.
I reported at http://www.davidhealy.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=14&Itemid=32  that the proposal was going on public display and that I didn’t agree with it.  Local residents have also expressed their disagreement and as a result, the Special Amenity Area Order Management Committee (meeting on 5th July) recommended against the proposal and the full Council (meeting on 10th July) agreed to reject it.  Instead, the Council to simply mark the few existing spaces outside the field at the corner on Strand Road.  The estimated €50,000 remains in the kitty for the Special Amenity Area Order and I will be pressing to have it spent on signage and maintenance of rights of way.

Local Transportation workshop, Darndale/Balgriffin/Belcamp/Clonshaugh

TURAS
TRANSPORTATION, URBAN RE-ORGANISATION And SUSTAINABILITY

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION WORKSHOP

NEW ROADS ARE NOT THE ANSWER TO TRAFFIC PROBLEMS IN CLONSHAUGH/ BELCAMP/ DARNDALE/
BALGRIFFIN/ CLARE HALL.

THE GREEN PARTY HAS ASKED THE TURAS PROGRAMME TO FACILITATE A WORKSHOP ON TRANSPORT FOR THIS AREA.

THE TURAS PROGRAMME IS AN EXCITING ALTERNATIVE WHICH FULLY INVOLVES ALL MEMBERS AND SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY IN DESIGNING NEW TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS

FIND OUT MORE AND PARTICIPATE AT:

CAMPION’S PUB
BALGRIFFIN
WEDNESDAY 19TH JULY 2006 at 8PM
ALL WELCOME

WORKSHOP FACILITATOR:
BRIAN GUCKIAN, RAIL & INTEGRATED TRANSPORT RESEARCHER
087 9140105    railprojects@eircom.net

WORKSHOP ORGANISED BY:
Cllr. DAVID HEALY, DUBLIN NORTH-EAST GREENS
01 8324087     verdire@eircom.net      www.davidhealy.com
Fáilte roimh Gaeilge

Conference Report – Mainstreaming Low Carbon Buildings, Zero Carbon Cities

My reports on two conferences on sucessive days organised by the Cultivate Centre.

The first report is in the form of the recommendations I have taken from the discussion as to the successful implementation of energy standards in Local Area Plans.

Seminar on
Sustainable Communities and Mainstreaming low-carbon
buildings,
Wood Quay, 23rd
June.

From discussion at the
seminar, it seems that the planning applications for developments within the
LAPs should contain (at least) two distinct conditions in relation to meeting
the energy standards.

  1. Prior to development condition that
    a certificate be submitted that the detailed design meets the
    standards
  2. A
    requirement for submission of a certificate of testing of air-tightness and
    thermal imaging testing of insulation quality at the earliest appropriate stage
    of construction, certifying that the work has been done to the levels required
    by the detailed design.  Doing this at the earliest appropriate stage is
    important both in terms of facilitating corrections and also as the Planning
    Department’s leverage in enforcement is still strong at this
    stage.

 
Building to these
standards will require

  • training
  • ensuring the contractual duties and
    incentives are there to get the building done to the necessary
    quality.
  • checking of the quality of work at
    an early stage so that corrections can be made

 

The process of building
to these standards will require training for the workers involved, to understand
the value of and reason for airtight membrances, prevention of cold bridging
etc.

 
It is also likely to
require different contractual approaches whereby all subcontractors would also
be under a legal obligation as regards their impact on the insulation values and
airtightness of the building.   If for example someone putting in windows is not
responsible for an airtight seal between their work and the rest of the wall,
then the airtightness won’t work.  All parties (contractor, sub-contractor etc.)
should be under an incentive to cooperate to achieve the necessary airtightness
and insulation.  

 
It was suggested that as
Fingal is the largest landowner in many of the LAPs and certainly in the LAP
lands taken as a whole, it is in a good position to work through these details
and get an effective system in operation, with the proper contracts, procedures
and checks in operation.  The training would logically be most effectively
provided on-site and this would tie in as well.  Fingal should possibly look at
working with the instutions responsible for training in order to get their help
on this.

 
The speakers at the
Friday morning seminar (Gavin Killip of Environmental Change Institute http://www.40percent.org.uk/ and Paul
Evans of Inreb Faraday Partnership www.inreb.org) consider what Fingal is doing to
be achievable and valuable, but requiring some signficant changes from current
building practices.  They are both willing to assist Fingal in this should we
need their advice.

 
 

Conference
Towards zero carbon cities
, 22nd June, Cultivate

 

Dick
Gleeson, Dublin
City
Planner

Attended Sustainable
Sweden tour  www.sustainablesweden.org

Taking climate issues
seriously and integrating them into planning
system.

 

Cllr.
Susan Roaf, Oxford

15-20 kWh/m2yr
to run lifts in high-rise  (is this correct?  What
height?)

 

Paul
Evans

www.inreb.org,

www.sibart.org,

Kronsberg, Hannover,

Bo01, Malmo

Hockerton, Nottingham, 24
kWh/m2yr

 

Gavin
Killip

http://www.40percent.org.uk/

Use of post-construction
testing for air infiltration and thermal
imaging

 

I gave a presentation in
the afternoon.

 

Three other
presentations, all clear and informative:

Hugh
McClintock transport

Gerry
Wardell Climate neutral
enterprise

Henk
van der Kamp planning, densities, planning system
etc.

 

End.

 

 

 


 

 

Text of Fingal Energy Standards

The settled text of the Fingal Energy Standards being adopted in all new Local Area Plans is below.  This text has been included in Local Area Plans at Portmarnock, Kinsealy and Donabate.  It is in keeping with the standards adopted for plans at Cappagh, North-West Balbriggan and Castlelands, but is more detailed and specific.
Approach

Fingal County Council is committed as a priority to
encouraging more sustainable development through energy end use
efficiency, and increasing the use of renewable energy, in all new
building projects in the designated area within the Portmarnock Local
Area Plan.  

It will achieve this by:

·         Encouraging responsible environmental management in construction
·        
Promoting sustainable approaches to housing developments by spatial
planning, layout, design and detailed specification
·        
Ensuring high standards of energy efficiency in all housing
developments under its remit, and encouraging developers, owners, and
tenants to improve the environmental performance of the building stock,
including the deployment of renewable energy
·         For housing,
specifically applying an improvement of 60% relative to prevailing
norms as represented by the Building Regulations Part L
·        
For other buildings, specifically applying an improvement of 60%
relative to prevailing norms as represented by the Building Regulations
Part L
·         Anticipating the operational implementation of the
EU Directive on the Energy Performance of Buildings (EPBD) by
encouraging the energy rating and labelling of building energy
performance, so as to give visible recognition to such improvements.

The
specific approach proposed for developers is to set a target,
accompanied by a menu of design and technology options, including
renewable energy technologies, as a means of offering flexibility
towards meeting that target in the most technically and economically
feasible manner on a case by case basis.

As an initial step
towards achieving greater environment sustainability, Fingal County
Council is proposing the introduction of a performance based CO2
Emissions Target (CET) for new buildings being constructed within the
Portmarnock Local Area Plan.  

Targets

All new buildings
within the designated area will represent a significant improvement in
energy and associated environmental performance relative to prevailing
practice.  The following conditions apply:

Housing:

A
collective average reduction of at least 60% in CO2 emissions deriving
from energy usage for space and water heating within the housing
development, relative to a baseline of prevailing regulatory and design
practice.  This initial baseline of comparison is to be represented by
the provisions of Technical Guidance Document L (TGD L) to the Building
Regulations, 2002 using a conventional gas fired heating boiler with an
assumed seasonal efficiency of 75%.  The calculation is to be carried
out for the time being using the Heat Energy Rating Method in TGD L,
pending adoption of the official national methodology for determining
energy performance of housing for the purposes of the EU Energy
Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD).

In meeting this CO2 performance target, the development shall include:
·        
A collective average reduction of at least 60% in energy consumption
for space and water heating , relative to the baseline of existing
regulatory and design practice and using the methodology outlined
above; and
·         A contribution of 30% by renewable energy
supply systems to meet the collective space and water heating
requirements within the housing development.  

Non-residential:

A
collective reduction of at least 60% in CO2 emissions deriving from
total energy usage (space heating, water heating, lighting, other)
arising from all services within the development, relative to a
baseline of existing regulatory and design practice.  This initial
baseline of comparison is to be represented by the provisions of TGD L
to the Building Regulations, 2006.  In the absence of an official
national methodology for determining the energy performance of
non-domestic buildings, this calculation is to be carried out using a
method compliant with the draft European Standard prEN 13790.

In meeting this CO2 performance target, the development shall include:
·        
A collective average reduction of at least 60% in energy consumption
for all services , relative to the baseline of existing regulatory and
design practice and using a methodology as outlined above; and
·        
A contribution of 30% by renewable energy supply systems to meet the
collective energy requirements within the development.  

To
illustrate the above, using the Heat Energy Rating methodology, the
baseline energy performance of new housing is typically 125 kWh/m2/year
for space and water heating when constructed to the minimum
requirements of Building Regulations, 2002, and using a boiler with a
seasonal efficiency of 75%.  This translates into a CO2 performance of
23.7 kg/m2/year using a gas fired heating system.

Fingal
County Council requires that new housing developments should achieve a
60% reduction in CO2 emissions associated with space and water heating
(i.e. to below 9.5 kg/m2/year), which must include a reduction in
energy use for this purpose (i.e. to below 50 kWh/ m2/year) and a
contribution of at least 30% by renewable energy systems to meet the
collective space and water heating requirements within the development.

Menu of options

In pursuit of these targets, a strong menu of superior design and specification options will include the following:

·                     Site layout and associated bio-climatic/ passive solar design measures
·                     Enhanced levels of insulation in walls, roofs, floors, glazing and doors
·                     Reduced uncontrolled air infiltration losses
·                     Use of healthy and controllable ventilation systems
·                     Heat recovery systems
·                     Use of daylight
·                     Water conservation measures
·                     More sustainable building materials
·                     Improved heat generation appliance efficiency, e.g. condensing boilers
·                     Intelligent heating system configuration and time/ temperature/ zone/ function controls
·                     Efficient provision of domestic hot water
·                     Fuel switching to low or zero CO2 emitting fuels
·                     Energy efficient lighting systems
·                     Incorporation of renewable energy systems, e.g. active solar, heat pumps, biomass
·                     Provision of appropriate group or district heating systems.

In the case of non-domestic buildings, additional options include:

·                     Heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems and controls
·                     Electrical energy use including motive power
·                     Efficient lighting systems and controls
·                     Building Energy Management Systems
·                     Occupancy controls
·                     Monitoring and Targeting systems
·                     Combined Heat and Power (CHP).

Other measures which can contribute to the energy efficiency and renewable energy targets can also be considered.

This
menu approach enables specifiers and developers to adopt approaches
which are responsive to site and client circumstances and constraints,
and offers the flexibility to explore and employ different mixes of
options on a case by case basis, to maximise technical and economic
feasibility.