Author Archives: david

Objection to planning application beside Evora Terrace, Dunbo Hill, Evora Park

I have objected to a planning application beside Evora Terrace, Dunbo Hill and Evora Park which seeks to use Evora Terrace as a construction access and would thereby put the stability of the houses there at risk.

                                    Cllr David Healy
                                    Green Party/Comhaontas Glas
                                    Howth ward  / Ceantar Bhinn Éadair
                                    www.davidhealy.com
                                    54, Páirc Éabhóra,
                                    Beann Éadair,
                                    Co. Bh.Á.C.

                                    087 6178852

Planning Department,
Fingal County Council,
Main St.,
Swords,
Co. Dublin
By hand.

Re: F08A/0673
 

A Chairde,
 
I would like to object to the above proposal on the following grounds.

   1. The proposed access is unsuitable for access by construction traffic both due to its narrowness and the proximity of the houses on Evora Terrace and due to its construction. In particular, the use of the road for construction traffic would lead to a real risk of ground failure and consequent landslide and collapse of adjacent buildings.
   2. It appears that the proposed layout would involve changes in ground level adjacent to boundary walls to the site which would lead to a risk of collapse of those walls.
   3. The proposed layout involves excessive proximity to the rear of various adjacent houses, with consequent negative impacts on residential amenity
   4. The proposed layout and design of the proposed houses would lead to visual intrusion not in keeping with the designated Architectural Conservation Area for which a Statement of Character has recently been published.
   5. The application does not contain the necessary information for a full assessment, in particular all relevant cross sections and other information necessary to establish the relationship between the proposed houses and adjacent houses and gardens.

 

Is mise, le meas,
 
 

David Healy

Brickfields Site

The Affordable Homes Partnership is trying to get the Brickfields site rezoned for housing. When they came to talk to the councillors in November at an informal meeting, I pointed out that their proposals would not be acceptable to local residents and suggested the go away and think things through more thoroughly, including
a) providing some of the badly needed community facilities for which the site is zoned,and
b) not drawing major traffic through existing residential areas.

They have asked to meet us again, but have clearly not taken our previous comments on board.  My reply to the email asking for the meeting is below.
The letter referred to in the email is at www.davidhealy.com/home/davidhea/public_html/media/brickfield2.pdf

Dear Noeleen, fellow Councillors,

I take grave exception to the account of the last meeting in the letter from the AHP’s architects.

The letter is written as if the principle of rezoning this area of amenity-zoned land is accepted by the local Councillors.  AHP and their architects know perfectly well that a proposed rezoning of this land was rejected by the Council in preparing the 2005 CDP.  I pointed this history out at the meeting and in addition referred to the need for community facilities identified by the needs analysis jointly undertaken by local community organisations and the County Council.

 
The flaws in the presentation of the discussion include the following points which I made and which are not referred to:

This is amenity-zoned land and the public is entitled to expect amenities from it.

The height and design are unacceptable in proximity to existing houses

The proposed gated nature of the development is unacceptable.

There was no "question" as to the impact of a drop-off point for the station.  The impact of such a road is clear from the other accesses to the station and the only access route is through existing estates.

There was no commitment by Councillors to bring anything to local residents – quite the reverse; I expressed the view that if they had intended to infuriate local residents they couldn’t have done much more to achieve it, and suggested they go back to the drawing board.  I asked where this drop-off idea had come from and got no answer; indeed there seemed to be no design rationale for it.

 
I have for a while been questioning the practice of calling separate informal meetings in this manner and recommending that such issues and presentations should be part of the Area Committee meeting.  I can see no reason to hold a separate meeting, to which presumably the public and press will not have a right of attendance, if only because they don’t know about the meeting.  Whether intentional or not, this would be a circumvention of the right of public access in s45 of the Local Government Act 2001. I would be grateful if this matter could be included on the agenda of the Area Committee meeting.

 
I reserve my position in relation to other similar meetings but in relation to this proposal, I will not be attending any meeting to which the public does not have access lest my views be misrepresented again in this manner.

Regards,

David Healy

 

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Noeleen McHugh <Noeleen.McHugh@fingalcoco.ie> wrote:

    Dear Councillor,

     

    Following discussions with Cllr. Maher a meeting has been arranged with the Affordable Homes Partnership regarding the Brickfields site at Bayside.  The meeting will take place on 3rd April, 2008 at 2.30 p.m. at Baldoyle Library (30 minutes before the Area Committee Services A meeting).  I attach, for your information, copy of correspondence received from Niall D. Brennan Associates after the last presentation to the Committee by the AHP in November.

     

    Regards,

     

    Noeleen McHugh,

    A/Senior Executive Officer,

    Planning Department.

    Phone: 8905687

    Fax:     8905789

 

Examiner article on allotments

The Examiner ran a detailed article on allotments today, including a number of comments I made in an interview with them during the week.  The article demonstrates that the sharp rise in interest on the Northside is matched across the city and the country.
Reap what you sow
    
    Irish Examiner, 19th February 2008,  page 17
    
    Author: Pol O Conghaile
    
    Pol O Conghaile

PICTURE an allotment holder. Does an older man come to mind, planting carrots and potatoes in the grim years of rationing? Or do you conjure up the peaty slap of a younger shovel – a budding family, perhaps, a modern apartment dweller, or a female professional?

In recent years, the latter have become a lot more common. In fact, a revival of interest in Ireland’s suburban allotments has seen a marked change in the type of person growing vegetables and fruit for the kitchen table.

"The age profile is younger," says Michael Fox, chairman of the South Dublin Allotments Association (SDAA). "Most of the enquiries we have are from people in their 30s and 40s as opposed to older, retired people. We also get more enquiries from women than men."

South Dublin County Council, which sees allotments as "a valuable recreational asset to people without back gardens or who would like to extend the use of their existing garden", provides 241 plots on four sites at Tallaght, Clondalkin and Palmerstown. Its waiting list stands at 217, and it plans to open a further 30 plots in Lucan in 2009. Until recently, though, things didn’t look so positive. In the early 2000s, allotments, which became popular during World War II when local authorities made land available to city dwellers for food production, even seemed close to extinction.

"We’ve been buying land at such a premium over the years that they had to be let go," an employee at Dublin City Council told me. The council’s 1999 development plan sought to investigate the provision of 200 new allotments within 5km of the city centre, but the 2005-2011 plan struck off mention of them entirely.

In their day, Dublin’s plots were scattered from Donabate to Dalkey. As well as providing a sort of therapy, a restful recreation, the tenth of an acre plots served a practical purpose in yielding fruit and vegetables during lean years.

"It’s something that gets into the blood," Tony Wheeler, an allotment-holder in Cappogue, told me before that site was closed for industrial use last year. "If I’m in someone else’s garden, I’ll be down on my knees weeding or telling them what to do."

Over the years, however, enthusiasm waned. As the city and its lifestyles developed, a wide range of vegetables hit supermarket shelves, and many plots were integrated into council parks, open spaces or paved over for development.

"Every council in the country needs to rethink their policy on allotments," says Labour Party TD Joan Burton. "We’re constantly hearing about increasing levels of obesity, but the interest in increasing land for allotments just doesn’t seem to be there."

By 2004 there were four surviving allotment sites in Dublin. By comparison, according to the SDAA, Britain, which has a strong allotments tradition, has 15 plots per 1,000 households.

Since then, however, interest has blossomed. "We have a situation where a lot of people would like to grow their own vegetables," says the Green Party’s David Healy. In 1999, he points out, Fingal County Council had no waiting list for allotments. Today, the list has doubled from 200 in 2006 to 400 in 2008.

"In Ireland, we’re particularly badly served, in terms of people having access to locally grown food," Healy says. "It’s a bit unusual here that vegetable growing isn’t more common in people’s gardens." Fingal closed its allotments in Cappogue in 2007, but plans to develop a further 15 acres of land in Turvey, Donabate (doubling the number of allotments there), and is also looking at other sites, including one between Portmarnock and Malahide.

Like Michael Fox, Healy notices a broader spectrum of users, and attributes this to a growing awareness of environmental and sustainability issues, and the increasing number of people living in apartments or houses with miniscule gardens.

Asked whether such land would not be put to better use for housing, he suggests we look "a bit more cleverly and intelligently at how we use open space". Mixed use of suburban land is a central tenet of Green Party policy, and allotments fit that perfectly.

"Growing vegetables is a great use of open space," Healy says. "People have the visual amenity, the break between the buildings and so on. We should take this naturally as what goes into a park, just like sports facilities and walking areas and woodlands."

Demand is growing elsewhere, too. Galway City Council has established three community gardens in recent years, and a campaign to provide individual allotments is ongoing (and includes a waiting list), despite being thwarted by a shortage of land. In Cork, neither the City nor County Council offers allotments, though a growing number of plots are available for rent on private land.

"A lot of them are living in apartments or houses with no gardens," says Liam Murphy of the clients renting his 30 plots at Ladysbridge, east Cork.

Most come from Cork, he says; others from Dungarvan and Carrigaline.

"One thing I see is that a lot of them remember their fathers doing the garden, but that’s as far as it goes. They don’t understand that you shouldn’t grow potatoes in the same plot year after year, you should rotate; they remember bits and pieces about gardening. There’s a generation nearly gone that has never known gardening."

On a similar note, David Healy warns potential holders not to bite off more than they can chew (abandoned plots have been the bane of councils). "It is a commitment. Any kind of serious gardening is a commitment," he says.

The typical council plot in Dublin rings in at one-tenth of an acre and costs EUR40 to EUR100. Murphy’s range in size and are slightly more expensive;  though the price does include a freshly ploughed site and a stinky pile of manure.

For those willing to put in the work, needless to say, allotments can reap more than one kind of harvest. Users say they benefit from fresh air, a pottering social scene, the reduction of food miles and a hands-on contribution to agricultural sustainability.

"It’s no harm for people to know how to grow vegetables and do the kind of work which, in modern times,, people don’t have time for," one senior executive officer in Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council told me. "You walk into Superquinn or whatever and it’s all there on the shelf in front of you."

"I think I’d be gardening anyway, but food miles have become hugely important to us," says Michael Fox. "Certainly, importing winter vegetables seems an awful waste and an awful carbon footprint to leave, and an unnecessary one."

Allotments can pay social dividends too. In Donabate, an allotment is kept by the National Association of Housing for the Visually Impaired (NAHVI). After six years, the association hopes soon to divide it into sections with braille markings, giving clients more control.

"Working the allotment gives our young visually impaired clients a sense of pride in growing their own produce," says the NAHVI’s Margaret McGovern. "It has given them a good understanding of team work, plant life, and the importance of eating fresh, locally grown fruit and vegetables."

And signs are there could be further rethinks ahead. At a Dublin City Council meeting last year, it was agreed to look into the development of allotment sites in the city.

Among those mentioned was none other than Herbert Park, in the thick of Dublin 4.

Traffic Calming at Baily Green Road

Following a survey of residents, the Area Committee has approved the provision of speed cushions as traffic calming measures on Baily Green Road in Howth.

FINGAL COUNTY COUNCIL

MALAHIDE/HOWTH AREA COMMITTEE MEETING

(Services A – Transportation, Environment & Amenities and Water & Drainage)

Thursday 15th November, 2007

ITEM NO. 20(a)

NEW WORKS, ACCEPTANCE OF TENDERS ETC.,
 

TRAFFIC CALMING FOR BAILEY GREEN ROAD, HOWTH
 

Report:

At the Malahide/Howth Area Committee Meeting held on 6th September 2007 it was agreed that residents of Bailey Green Road, Howth would be surveyed to ascertain whether they were in favour of the proposed traffic calming.

The survey has been carried out and the results are as follows:

IN favour  20

NOT in favour  0

DID not respond 3

It is therefore recommended that traffic calming at the above location be approved for implementation.

Objection to Porto Fino development(Church St./Harbour Rd.)

A copy of my objection submitted in December to the above planning application.

                                          54, Evora Park,

                                          Howth,

                                          Co. Dublin

                                          www.davidhealy.com

                                          david.healy@fingalcoco.ie

                                          11th December 2007

Planning Department,

Fingal County Council,

Main St.,

Swords,

Co. Dublin

Re: Planning application F07A/1457

A chairde,

I hereby object to the above application on the following grounds:

The primary objection is the fact that the proposal would block the views of the Harbour and out to sea from the public realm of St. Lawrence’s Road, Howth Terrace, and Dunbo Hill.  

The views out from the residential streets of Howth to the Harbour and the sea are an essential element of the character of Howth.  For residents as well as visitors they are vital views, opening the tightly-built streets of the village to the sea. They are of practical significance for people watching activity in the Harbour.  As someone who lives on St. Lawrence’s Road, I know how important the views down to the Harbour are to the local community.   We notice which fishing trawlers are in the Harbour, note the comings and goings of the Asgard 2.  We note the shifting tide levels against the Harbour walls, and the condition of the seas beyond.

The view across no 53 Church St. from Howth Terrace / St. Lawrence’s Road is the only similar view in Howth. Other views down to the Harbour are from a greater distance and don’t look down into the Harbour as steeply.  Abbey St., the other main access route down to the Harbour, has no such views.

This view is recognised and protected in the Statement of Character for the Howth Architectural Conservation Area. There is a photograph of it in Figure 10 and it is marked on the annotated map in Figure 14 as a panoramic view.

The Statement of Character says (page 24)

      • VIEWS

      Preservation of views. The key views out of the village such as those at Howth Terrace, Church Street, Thormanby Road, Main Street Upper and from the Martello Tower should be preserved and any works within the ACA should not adversely impact or block these views.

It is notable that the application contains no assessment of the impact of the proposal on these views.  However, it’s impact is clear and it is in direct breach of this objective.

The Council has already recognised the importance of views from the town to the Harbour in relation to the St. Lawrence Quay apartment development to the east of this site.  In that instance, the Council required that the developer put a break in the building at the location traditionally used as a viewing point out over the Harbour.  (This application is possibly F94A/0362, although I cannot get into this file on the web-based planning system.)

I enclose €20.

Is mise, le meas,
 
 

Cllr. David Healy
 
 
 

 
 
 

Material Contravention for Edros site approved

Today, the Council voted by 20 votes to 3 to approve the material contravention for the Edros site.  I and my Green colleagues supported the proposal, as did the other two Howth ward Councillors.  The proposal enables the development of residential housing and a café on this amenity-zoned site.  Normally I would not accept that an amenity site could be used for residential development.  However, in this instance an alternative site for a major new community facility has been identified and €2million is to be paid by the developer towards the construction of a new community facility on that site.

The agreed site is as part of the overall site at Baltray between
Baltray Park and the Techcrete/Teelings site, including the City
Council-owned depot.  The City Council has committed to transfer the
depot site and that gives sufficient space for a major community
facility.  However, the Planning Department is committed to working
with the Techcrete site developer to incorporate the community facility
into the overall development in the most appropriate manner.  This will
mean maximising accessibility from the Dart station and the town of
Howth and also taking advantage of the potential for a link across the
railway line to Baltray beach.

The Edros site was the site of a community facility which operated from the 1970s until the 1990s, when it became insolvent and was sold to a private developer to pay its creditors.  Since then it has lain derelict.

Until Friday I felt that the plans for community facilities were not sufficiently advanced to enable Councillors to support the proposed Edros material contravention.  I have been communicating this to Council officials for about a year, including by objection to the planning file and up to last Friday fully expected to be opposing the material contravention vote today.

I do appreciate that some Howth residents are unhappy about the design of the proposal. I have never seen this as the main objection.  I do feel the design is of a high architectural quality and I’m hopeful that it will work out well.

The other consideration raised today was a suggestion that the €2million was not enough of a contribution.  This hadn’t been put to me before and on balance I think it’s probably correct – we probably should have sought more money for the community facilities.  However, €2 million was an increase on what was previously on offer and on balance I think our decision was a good one.

I enclose below the email I sent to the Council officials and my fellow Howth ward councillors which gives I think the full picture of our discussions on Friday.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: David Healy / Daithí Ó hÉalaithe <verdire@gmail.com>
Date: Jan 11, 2008 7:33 PM
Subject: Community facilities in Howth, Edros site
To: Pat Queenan <pat.queenan@fingalcoco.ie>, Peter Caulfield <peter.caulfield@fingalcoco.ie>, Gilbert Power <gilbert.power@fingalcoco.ie>, Jmaher <joanmaher1@eircom.net>, Michael Joe Cosgrave <michaelj.cosgrave@fingalcoco.ie>

Dear Pat, Peter, Gilbert, Joan, Michael Joe,

Thank you for the constructive discussion today and the work that has been done in the background.  It is encouraging that progress has been made to a degree which honestly i hadn’t expected.

I am hopeful that we will be able to come to an agreement on Monday.  I just wanted to make a note of the basis on which our discussions today indicated we are likely to come to an agreement.

   1. The agreed site for the major community facility is in the Baltray area between the tennis courts and Teelings (inclusive).   This is agreed by the Penfacs committee, the County Manager, and, hopefully on Monday, the elected Council.
   2. The City Manager will commit to proposing to his Council to transfer the Baltray depot site to the County Council subject to the condition that either it is to be used for community facilities itself or it is to be incorporated in an overall development site within which at an area at least as big would be dedicated to community facilities.
   3. The applicant for the Edros site will commit to a €2m contribution to these community facilities in the light of the fact that their development is on an amenity-zoned site used up to now for community facilities.  This contribution will be paid in instalments over 2 years from the granting of the material contravention even if the development takes longer to complete.
   4. The Council’s Planning and Community Departments, the team working on the Urban Centre Strategy, and Penfacs will liaise with the Techcrete site owner in relation to integration of the community facility in the overall site between the tennis courts and Teelings and in relation to the level of contribution to the community facility from the Techcrete development itself. The Community Department will continue to work with Penfacs to progress the plans and will report back to the Area Committee regularly.

It would be important for the documentation for points 2 and 3 to be supplied and for points 1 and 4 to be reflected in the Manager’s Report, in order to form a solid basis for the Council’s vote.

Yours, optimistically,

David

Objection to Stapolin Phase 5 development

I have objected to Phase 5 of the Stapolin development which is much higher than provided for in the Area Plan and severed from the new Millennium Park.  The parking levels will lead to traffic generation which will block all roads in the area.  These are consistent complaints in relation to recent phases of this development and all of the above complaints are breaches of the County Development Plan.

                                                      Cllr David Healy
                                                      Green Party/Comhaontas Glas
                                                      Howth ward/ Ceantar Bhinn Éadair
                                                      www.davidhealy.com
                                                 
                                                      54, Páirc Éabhóra,  
                                                      Beann Éadair,
                                                      Co. Bh.Á.C.
                                                      087 6178852
                                                     8th January 2008

Planning Department,
Fingal County Council,
Main St.
Swords,

Co. Dublin
Re: Stapolin Development Phase 5, F07A/1561

A chairde,  

I wish to make the following observations on the above application.

I am one of the local Councillors statutorily responsible for the adoption of the County Development Plan and Local Area Plan which Fingal County Council is legally bound to implement as well as the Area Action Plan adopted before the 2000 Planning Act was fully brought into force.  The local community and we as Councillors put great effort into determining the forward planning documents for this site.  We believe that informed dialogue and shared analysis improves the plan and the resulting developments.  

The conditions set out in advance in the Area Action Plan are being disregarded in this application.  Indeed it appears that having succeeded in getting a decision to grant permission for breach of the conditions of the Action Plan in their last application, (F06A/0671), they are now seeking an even greater breach in this application.  The applicant says “There are many examples of heights exceeding those projected in the Action Plan and Masterplan…”

I should also point out that the various references to the Masterplan in the application are to a document which has not status and was not subject to any public consultation nor approval by Councillors or through any planning process.
 

My particular concerns are as follows.

Height

The original height limit in the area plan was 5 storeys, yet the decision provides for 9 storey buildings.  This is not acceptable in particular in terms of visual impact on the area.  These new high buildings will be visible across this low-lying area, including from existing houses and gardens in Baldoyle and the green belt/proposed public park which is in a designated sensitive landscape.  In addition, a 5 storey limit is an appropriate limit for energy conservation and adaptation to climate change. (see Roaf, S. et al., 2004, Adapting Buildings and Cities for Climate Change: A 21st Century Survival Guide).
Split between houses and apartments
 

The plan will lead to a further breach of the overall 60/40 split between houses and apartments planned for the area

Internal overshadowing of public and private open space

One of the knock-on consequences of the breaches of the height limits is the overshadowing of public and private open space.  The overshadowing from buildings of this height will be severe.

Traffic

The total extent and quantity of development proposed will, unless measures are taken to restrict motor traffic, generate levels of private car traffic which will exceed the capacity of the local road network in Baldoyle, Donaghmede and Sutton.   

One logical approach would be to restrict the quantum of car parking on site to levels which would consequently keep traffic levels within the capacity of the road network.  This would apply to all the forms of development on site, offices, retail and residential, and would require that traffic management plans be drawn up for implementation both before and after the streets are taken in charge.   

Instead, what is proposed is 2 car parking spaces per dwelling.  This is in breach of the requirements of the County Development Plan (Policy TP4, Objective TO6 and Table 6.2) which specifies maximum car parking of 1 to 2 per unit, depending variously on design, dwelling size, access to public transport and local facilities.   

In an area with a significant proportion of small units, good public transport access and local facilities in walking distance, and what should be pedestrian-oriented street design, providing 2 spaces per unit is clearly in excess of the maximum.
Street and Road Design

Detailed street and road design should prioritise public transport, walking and cycling in an effective manner.  Unfortunately the detailed design in relation to the previous planning applications as part of this overall development has not done this and has breached both the Design Manual for cycling facilities, good engineering practice and common sense.  The conditions imposed in previous permissions clearly were not good enough.

Roundabout on Coast Road

The most striking instance of this is the roundabout on Coast Road.  This roundabout was constructed without approval by the Council under the relevant planning permission and this therefore unauthorised. Contrary to the assertions in the EIS (11.2.3.20) the roundabout does not provide high quality facilities for pedestrians and the mobility impaired as it makes no meaningful provision for crossing the carriageway at this location.  This location also includes marked cycle facilities on the footpath which do not comply with either the statutory requirements for cycle tracks or the Provision of Cycling Facilities | National Manual for Urban Areas.”
 

Millenium Park including fencing off of the Park

The application claims that the development of the Park is occuring / to occur “in accordance with compliance details already agreed with Fingal County Council, on foot of conditions attached to planning permissions attached to planning permissions granted for Phase 1(F02A/0921; PL06F.201400) and the infrastructural development planning permission (F03A/1520;PL 06F.208508)”

In fact, no planning permission has been applied for or granted which covers the area of the Millennium Park and therefore any work in this area is being carried out without planning permission.  A condition requiring the submission of plans for the park does not amount to a permission to carry out work.

I am particularly concerned at the proposal in this application to erect a 2m fence around the park, severing it from the neighbouring residential area, preventing the use of the park as a pedestrian and cyclist route through the overall area, and reducing informal surveillance, thereby increasing the likelihood of anti-social behaviour in the Park.  Proper urban design would promote of access to the Park and maximising its availability as a through-route for local pedestrians and cyclists.

Is mise, le meas,  

 

Cllr. David Healy

 

€20 planning fee enclosed.

Bad news on the flat waste charge

Two Green Party motions against the flat waste charge were voted down by Fingal County Councillors today (by majorities of 14 to 8 and 10 to 8).  The Manager had indicated that he intended to disregard the Councillors in any event, but the effective votes of support for the flat charge now means he is no longer under pressure to abandon the proposal.  The motions defeated are below.

Additionally, I made notes in relation to overspending and inefficiency in the waste element of the budget, and I attach them also below.

Motion 1. That the budget be amended by amending the first and second paragraphs of page 35 to read

" It is proposed to introduce a brown bin collection in most of the county and an amount of €200,000 has been provided for transfer to capital towards the funding of the capital costs of this expansion.  In addition, during 2008, it is proposed that households will be provided with a more frequent "green bin" collection accepting plastic bottles.

"The provision of the full range of recycling facilities, including more frequent green bin, brown bin, recycling centres, bottle banks and the environmental awareness service, means that the cost of this service has risen substantially.  In order to provide for these enhanced recycling facilities, there will be an increase in the cost of the bin tag on grey bins."

Vote 14 to 10

Motion 2. “That all domestic waste charges in Fingal for the black bin be levied per lift of a  waste bin or on volume or weight of waste disposed of, and not levied on a flat charge  or standing charge basis.”

Vote 10 to 8

Reduction of waste management costs

The objections in terms of fairness, environmental effectiveness and on the basis of the polluter pays principle are obvious and have been expressed to us by our constituents. These notes address the costs which are to be met by this new flat charge. 

It is clear that we need to raise more money in the waste area.  It is very doubtful that we need to raise as much as currently estimated.  The Manager has indicated that he intends to raise €14m a year this year and €22m a year in subsequent years from the flat waste charge.  The plan to raise €22m a year long-term is excessive, as it does not take account of the following:

Major saving 1. Oxigen contract 

Oxigen’s current contract is costing us about €400/t.  This is about twice what it should be.  The total sum required should be reduced to take account of this.

Major Saving 2. 3-weekly green bin
There is no need for a fortnightly green bin collection as proposed.  Every 3 weeks would be adequate.  Up to now we have offered extra bins for those who find their 4-weekly green bin is full and therefore would like to have two bins.  There has been almost no take up on this.  The total sum required should be reduced to take account of collection every 3 weeks.

Major Saving 3. Fortnightly grey bin
There is no need for a weekly grey bin collection.  The Manager says that the average frequency of presentation is once every 3 weeks. Therefore the weekly collection should be reduced to fortnightly immediately.  The total sum required should be reduced to take account of this.

(All of the above were discussed at CPG but not taken account of.  The Environment SPC has never discussed this, which I would have thought was its role.)

Major Saving 4 More efficient brown bin system
Organic waste/brown bin collection requires more attention – what we are planning is less than optimal in all respects.

I was at part of the Waste Conference in Croke Park recently for a presentation by Florian Amlinger of Austria.  It was very interesting and we should be learning from other places’ experiences more.

Their approach (not universal across Austria, but best practice):

1. home composting – best authorities have c. 55% home composting
We shouldn’t be collecting organic waste in rural areas or ribbon development zones; we should be encouraging them to compost, supplying bins etc.

2. best composting system uses small containers for kitchen waste, collected weekly.  Small and light containers –compostable bags (25¢ each) or lidded buckets, lifted by hand  to empty into small vehicle.  The slide he showed was of a husband and wife collection team, in which the husband drives the vehicle which has an open trailer or trailer-like section to the back into which his wife empties the bins.

3. bulky garden waste can either
a)    be dropped off, or
b)    put out to one of 2 to 4 collections a year, which work by sending the shredder around and shredding on the spot.

Results:
The cost of waste collection system for houses with the organic system above, dry recyclable collection and residual waste collection is approx €110-130 per household per year.

Austria has reduced the quantity of biodegradable waste in the residual collection by 73% in a few years.

The presentation is  here. 

Possible future saving:  Increased contributions from Repak to recycling costs
The Minister for the Environment has indicated that he intends to seek increased cost recovery from Repak for the costs of dealing with packaging waste recycling.  At the moment they fund about 5% of the Oxigen costs (note that includes newspaper which is not packaging).

Brief interruption to water supply

There will be a short disruption to the water supply in the areas listed below on Thursday morning 6th December, between  10 am
and 11 am.
Offington
Carrickbrack
Duncarraig
St. Fintans
Howth Road (between Sutton cross and turn for Claremont Road) The disruption is to facilitate leakage testing on the water main in the area and most houses will only be affected for between 15 minutes and half an hour.

A public notice will be displayed in businesses in the area as well as on our website and on Aertel page 624.

Traffic Calming for Baily Green Road

The Area Committee has approved traffic calming measures for Baily Green Road in Howth. The road, leading from the Summit Inn to the Baily Green/ Summit carpark, has suffered from nuisance and danger from speeding cars in recent times.  The traffic calming approved consists of speed cushions at three locations on the short road.  A copy of the report to the meeting is below.
Download the original attachment

FINGAL COUNTY COUNCIL

MALAHIDE/HOWTH AREA COMMITTEE MEETING

(Services A – Transportation, Environment & Amenities

and Water & Drainage)

Thursday 15th November, 2007

ITEM NO. 20(a)

NEW WORKS, ACCEPTANCE OF TENDERS ETC.,
 

TRAFFIC CALMING FOR BAILEY GREEN ROAD, HOWTH
 

Report:

At the Malahide/Howth Area Committee Meeting held on 6th September 2007 it was agreed that residents of Bailey Green Road, Howth would be surveyed to ascertain whether they were in favour of the proposed traffic calming.

The survey has been carried out and the results are as follows:

IN favour  20

NOT in favour  0

DID not respond 3

It is therefore recommended that traffic calming at the above location be approved for implementation.